IQAC
- About IQAC
- AQAR Report
Library
RTI
NIRF
Alumni

Home
About Us
Academic
Infrastructure
IQAC / NAAC
STUDENT CORNER
Gallery
SAC Virtual Academy

Home
About Us
Academic
Infrastructure
IQAC / NAAC
STUDENT CORNER
Gallery
SAC Virtual Academy

Feedback Form

Feedback Form

Teacher

Staff Name*

Department*

1. Syllabus is suitable to the course **

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

2. Syllabus is need based*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

3. Course Content is Followed by corresponding reference materials **

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

4. Sufficient number of prescribed books are available in the Library *

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

5. Infrastructural Facilities, Canteen and Internet *

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

6. Sufficient time is available to conduct examination for coverage of all units in the syllabus*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

7. I have the freedom to adopt new techniques of teaching*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

8. I have the freedom to adopt/adapt new techniques/Strategies of testing and assessment of students*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

9. The Environment in the college is conductive to teaching and research *

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

10. The Administration is teacher friendly *

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Suggestions*

Email address*

This field should be left blank

Alumni

Name*

Address - Mobile Number*

Year of Study*

Email Id*

Dear Alumni, We are glad that you have spent your valuable years by studying UG/PG and M.Phil Courses in SACWC, Cumbum. You will be pleased to know that your institute has, in a short period of time, grown to be one of the leading and sought-after Institutes. We would like to place on record that we anticipate your cooperation and consistent support for our further development through your contribution. It will be appreciable and thankful if you can spare some of your valuable time to fill up this feedback form and give us your valuable suggestions for further improvement of the Institute.*

Programme*

M.Phil

1. How have you pleased with our college environment? *

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

2. Mark the convenience of our college Infrastructure*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

3. Grade your department faculties*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

4. Quality of given study materials **

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

5. Mark the role of Training and Placement cell. *

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

6. Say how will you appreciate our college non-teaching staff/office Staff.*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

7. How well your professors trained you in Project Guidance?*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

8. How well you had utilised our college Library proficiency?*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

9. Rate our college Hostel accommodation*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

10. Give a rate for our college Canteen provisions.*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

11. Make out the function of your Department lab requirements*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

12. Spot the excellence of Sports training*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

13. Rate the amount of enjoyment in our college Cultural functions.*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

14. Say the usefulness of our college certificate courses*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

15. Say how helpful was our college awarenes programs were*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Comments and Suggestions if any: *

This field should be left blank

Student Satisfaction Survey

National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) 
Student Satisfaction Survey 
Key Indicator - 2.7.1 
Under Criterion II of Teaching – Learning and Evaluation

Guidelines for Students

NAAC (National Assessment and accreditation council) is conducting a Student Satisfaction Survey regarding Teaching – Learning and Evaluation, which will help to upgrade the quality in higher education. A student will have to respond to all the questions given in the following format with her/his sincere effort and thought. Her/his identity will not be revealed.

Name*

Department*

Programme*

Year*

Instructions to fill the questionnaire

● All questions should be compulsorily attempted.

● Each question has five responses, choose the most appropriate one. ● The response to the qualitative question no. 21 is student’s opportunity to give suggestions or improvements; she/he can also mention weaknesses of the institute here. (Kindly restrict your response to teaching learning process only)

Criterion II – Teaching–Learning and Evaluation

Student Satisfaction Survey on Teaching Learning Process

Following are questions for online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process.

1. How much of the syllabus was covered in the class? *

4 – 85 to 100%

3 – 70 to 84%

2 – 55 to 69%

1– 30 to 54%

0 –Below 30%

2. How well did the teachers prepare for the classes?

4 –Thoroughly

3 – Satisfactorily

2 – Poorly

1 – Indifferently

0 – Won’t teach at all

3. How well were the teachers able to communicate?

4 – Always effective

3 – Sometimes effective

2 – Just satisfactorily

1– Generally ineffective

0– Very poor communication

4. The teacher’s approach to teaching can best be described as

4– Excellent

3 – Very good

2 – Good

1 – Fair

0– Poor

5. Fairness of the internal evaluation process by the teachers.

4 – Always fair

3 – Usually fair

2 – Sometimes unfair

1 – Usually unfair

0– Unfair

6. Was your performance in assignments discussed with you?

4 – Every time

3 – Usually

2 – Occasionally/Sometimes

1 – Rarely

0– Never

7. The institute takes active interest in promoting internship, student exchange, field visit opportunities for students.

4 – Regularly

3 – Often

2 – Sometimes

1 – Rarely

0– Never

8. The teaching and mentoring process in your institution facilitates you in cognitive, social and emotional growth.

4 – Significantly

3 – Very well

2 – Moderately

1 – Marginally

0– Not at all

9. The institution provides multiple opportunities to learn and grow.

4 – Strongly agree

3 – Agree

2 – Neutral

1 – Disagree

0– Strongly disagree

10. Teachers inform you about your expected competencies, course outcomes and programme outcomes.

4 – Every time

3 – Usually

2 – Occasionally/Sometimes

1 – Rarely

0– Never

11. Your mentor does a necessary follow-up with an assigned task to you.

4 – Every time

3 – Usually

2 – Occasionally/Sometimes

1 – Rarely

0 – I don’t have a mentor

12. The teachers illustrate the concepts through examples and applications.

4 – Every time

3 – Usually

2 – Occasionally/Sometimes

1 – Rarely

0– Never

13. The teachers identify your strengths and encourage you with providing right level of challenges.

4 – Fully

3 – Reasonably

2 – Partially

1 – Slightly

0– Unable to

14. Teachers are able to identify your weaknesses and help you to overcome them.

4 – Every time

3 – Usually

2 – Occasionally/Sometimes

1 – Rarely

0 – Never

15. The institution makes effort to engage students in the monitoring, review and continuous quality improvement of the teaching learning process.

4 – Strongly agree

3 – Agree

2 – Neutral

1 – Disagree

0– Strongly disagree

16. The institute/ teachers use student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies for enhancing learning experiences.

4 – To a great extent

3 – Moderate

2 – Some what

1 – Very little

0 – Not at all

17. Teachers encourage you to participate in extracurricular activities.

4 – Strongly agree

3 – Agree

2 – Neutral

1 – Disagree

0– Strongly disagree

18. Efforts are made by the institute/ teachers to inculcate soft skills, life skills and employability skills to make you ready for the world of work.

4 – To a great extent

3 – Moderate

2 – Some what

1 – Very little

0 – Not at all

19. What percentage of teachers use ICT tools such as LCD projector, Multimedia, etc. while teaching.

4 – Above 90%

3 – 70 – 89%

2 – 50 – 69%

1 – 30 – 49%

0 – Below 29%

20. The overall quality of teaching-learning process in your institute is very good.

4 – Strongly agree

3 – Agree

2 – Neutral

1 – Disagree

0– Strongly disagree

21. Give three observation / suggestions to improve the overall teaching – learning experience in your institution.

This field should be left blank

Student

Name*

Department

Programe

Year*

I. Curriculum

1. Depth of the course content including project work if any **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

2. Extent of course coverage **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

3. Applicability / relevance of course to real life situation **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

4. Learning acquisition (in terms of knowledge, concepts, manual skills, analytical abilities and broadening perspectives)*

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

5. Clarity and relevance of textual & learning material of the course **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

6. Relevance of other source materials (library) of the course **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

7. Extent of effort required for students **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

II. Student overall evaluation on Teaching & Learning

1. The syllabus of each course was **

Adequate

Inadequate

Challenging

Dull

2. Benefits of the course **

More than adequate

Adequate

Inadequate

Cannot say

3. Was the course easy or difficult to understand? **

Easy

Manageable

Difficult

Very difficult

4. How much of the syllabus was covered in classroom teaching? **

85 to 100%

70 to 85%

55 to 70%

Less than 55%

5. The library materials and facilities for your course.*

More than adequate

Adequate

Inadequate

Very Poor

6. To what extent were you able to get materials for your prescribed syllabus? **

More than adequate

Adequate

Inadequate

Very Poor

7. How well did the teacher prepare for the classes? **

Thoroughly

Satisfactorily

Poorly

Indifferently

8. How well was the teacher able to communicate? **

Always effective

Sometimes effective

Just satisfactorily

Generally ineffective

9. How far the teacher encouraged your classroom participation? **

Very Effectively

Always

Sometimes

Not at all

10. Classroom participation method that you like **

Raising Questions

Peer Discussion

Play-way method

Group Analysis

11. How helpful was the teacher in improving your learning process? **

Very helpful

Sometimes helpful

Always indifferent

Did not advise

12. The teacher’s approach can best be described as*

Always courteous

Sometimes rude

Always indifferent

Need to improve

13. Internal assessment was*

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

14. What effect do you think the internal assessment had on your course grade?*

Helped to improve

Discouraging

No special effect

Sometimes effective

15. How often did you think the internal assessment had its impact on your degree assessment?*

Regularly

Sometimes

Seldom

Never

16. How about your assignment discussion with the teacher? **

Always discussed

Partially discussed

Sometimes discussed

Not discussed at all

17. Seminars / Workshops / Guest Lectures arranged by the department. **

Extra ordinary

Useful

Adequate

Inadequate

18.Suggestion for the improvement of teaching - learning process. **

III.Student Feedback on Teachers

1. Knowledge base of the teachers (as perceived by you)*

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

2. Communication Skills (in terms of articulation and comprehensibility) **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

3. Sincerity / Commitment of the teacher **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

4. Interest created by the teacher **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

5. Ability to integrate course material with environment/other issues. **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

6. Ability to integrate content with other courses **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

7. Accessibility of the teacher in and out of the class **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

8. Ability to design quizzes /Tests /assignments / examinations and projects to evaluate the students.*

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

9. Provision of sufficient time for feedback **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

IV. Student Feedback on Infrastructure

1. Class Room **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

2. Seminar Hall **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

3. ICT Facility **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

4. (a) General Digital Library **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

(b) Department Library **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

5. Laboratories **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

6. Furniture **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

7. Canteen **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

8. Suggestions, if any *

This field should be left blank

Employer

Name of the Employer*

Name of the Organization *

Address of the Organization

Designation of the Employer*

Date*

Employee Name*

Employee Designation*

Interpersonal Skill and Problem solving*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Team work and Commitment*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Integrity with Innovation*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Negotiation Skill*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Human Relation Skill*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Punchuality*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Job knowledge with Communication*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Initiative*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Decision Making and Leadership quality*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Administration Skill*

Excellent

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

Poor

Any Other*

This field should be left blank

Contact Details

Sri Adi Chunchanagiri Women’s College

Cumbum – Kumily Road
Cumbum – 625516
Tamil Nadu

Cell: +91 99942 96599, +91 93844 06407
Email: sacwc96@gmail.com,

Quick Links

Home
About Us
Contact Us
Departments
Gallery
News & Events