Name*

Department

Programe

Year*

I. Curriculum

1. Depth of the course content including project work if any **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

2. Extent of course coverage **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

3. Applicability / relevance of course to real life situation **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

4. Learning acquisition (in terms of knowledge, concepts, manual skills, analytical abilities and broadening perspectives)*

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

5. Clarity and relevance of textual & learning material of the course **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

6. Relevance of other source materials (library) of the course **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

7. Extent of effort required for students **

VeryGood

Good

Satisfied

UnSatisfied

II. Student overall evaluation on Teaching & Learning

1. The syllabus of each course was **

Adequate

Inadequate

Challenging

Dull

2. Benefits of the course **

More than adequate

Adequate

Inadequate

Cannot say

3. Was the course easy or difficult to understand? **

Easy

Manageable

Difficult

Very difficult

4. How much of the syllabus was covered in classroom teaching? **

85 to 100%

70 to 85%

55 to 70%

Less than 55%

5. The library materials and facilities for your course.*

More than adequate

Adequate

Inadequate

Very Poor

6. To what extent were you able to get materials for your prescribed syllabus? **

More than adequate

Adequate

Inadequate

Very Poor

7. How well did the teacher prepare for the classes? **

Thoroughly

Satisfactorily

Poorly

Indifferently

8. How well was the teacher able to communicate? **

Always effective

Sometimes effective

Just satisfactorily

Generally ineffective

9. How far the teacher encouraged your classroom participation? **

Very Effectively

Always

Sometimes

Not at all

10. Classroom participation method that you like **

Raising Questions

Peer Discussion

Play-way method

Group Analysis

11. How helpful was the teacher in improving your learning process? **

Very helpful

Sometimes helpful

Always indifferent

Did not advise

12. The teacher’s approach can best be described as*

Always courteous

Sometimes rude

Always indifferent

Need to improve

13. Internal assessment was*

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

14. What effect do you think the internal assessment had on your course grade?*

Helped to improve

Discouraging

No special effect

Sometimes effective

15. How often did you think the internal assessment had its impact on your degree assessment?*

Regularly

Sometimes

Seldom

Never

16. How about your assignment discussion with the teacher? **

Always discussed

Partially discussed

Sometimes discussed

Not discussed at all

17. Seminars / Workshops / Guest Lectures arranged by the department. **

Extra ordinary

Useful

Adequate

Inadequate

18.Suggestion for the improvement of teaching - learning process. **

III.Student Feedback on Teachers

1. Knowledge base of the teachers (as perceived by you)*

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

2. Communication Skills (in terms of articulation and comprehensibility) **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

3. Sincerity / Commitment of the teacher **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

4. Interest created by the teacher **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

5. Ability to integrate course material with environment/other issues. **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

6. Ability to integrate content with other courses **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

7. Accessibility of the teacher in and out of the class **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

8. Ability to design quizzes /Tests /assignments / examinations and projects to evaluate the students.*

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

9. Provision of sufficient time for feedback **

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

IV. Student Feedback on Infrastructure

1. Class Room **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

2. Seminar Hall **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

3. ICT Facility **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

4. (a) General Digital Library **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

(b) Department Library **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

5. Laboratories **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

6. Furniture **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

7. Canteen **

Ample

Sufficient

Can be adjusted

Lacking

8. Suggestions, if any *

Feedback Form

Teacher

Alumni

Student Satisfaction Survey

Student

Employer

Sri Adi Chunchanagiri Women’s College